Wednesday, October 3, 2012
Friday, May 11, 2012
Latest Fashion Swimsuits for men
Swimsuits for men is part of men's fashion, which often gets lost in the general fashion lines. Many people forget or do not realize that men's bathing suits can be very sexy. Should not be shorter all the time sad. Things such as bathrooms for men, women are interesting alternatives Speedo swimwear for men who are in the fashion world. It is to be comfortable with who you are.
The current trend is to wear swimsuits men around the world that tells women. Styles that sandals and slippers for men are the areas of property on the market right now. Bathroom Speedo for men is actually a part of swimming more popular in high demand around the world wear.
However, it is very likely that you or people around you do not know about these men swim trunk trends. You might think that your bathing suit for men is a swimsuit big and ugly. The top of the memories of swimming, which is used by swimmers. Now you have the freedom to say that there are new fashion styles. And these models are much bolder and therefore more attractive.
What many do not realize is that the body of a man is a thing of beauty. It is intended to be viewed the world in general. Using a swimsuit showing her sexuality is very basic and there. If you are a human right or not, you are required to have a lot of attention from everyone when you wear something that flatters your body.
Get the right kind of attention of all is also one of the main reasons for these styles continue to dominate the world. Besides that you look good, some swimming bears are ideal for tanning the entire body. Makes it look like the man was naked tanning is not really so. Therefore, very attractive option E "for many men with light skin.
Men swimwear bikinis are hot. They come in different forms in scope. Coverage options for both front and rear. This makes it easier for you to choose exactly what you have in mind. With this variety in the market, it is easy to choose your own style every time.
However, in extreme cases, the actual scenario is considered the sexiest in progress. Many men around the world experimenting with bathing suits for men at high risk. This is the type of swimwear for men, a little to the imagination. It's a turning point for many women and men. And "therefore an attractive option for people in all directions.
The current trend is to wear swimsuits men around the world that tells women. Styles that sandals and slippers for men are the areas of property on the market right now. Bathroom Speedo for men is actually a part of swimming more popular in high demand around the world wear.
However, it is very likely that you or people around you do not know about these men swim trunk trends. You might think that your bathing suit for men is a swimsuit big and ugly. The top of the memories of swimming, which is used by swimmers. Now you have the freedom to say that there are new fashion styles. And these models are much bolder and therefore more attractive.
Get the right kind of attention of all is also one of the main reasons for these styles continue to dominate the world. Besides that you look good, some swimming bears are ideal for tanning the entire body. Makes it look like the man was naked tanning is not really so. Therefore, very attractive option E "for many men with light skin.
However, in extreme cases, the actual scenario is considered the sexiest in progress. Many men around the world experimenting with bathing suits for men at high risk. This is the type of swimwear for men, a little to the imagination. It's a turning point for many women and men. And "therefore an attractive option for people in all directions.
Swim wear for women | Swimsuit for Pregnancy woman
Swimwear for women with the sexy design
Who says pregnant women can not wear a swimsuit during pregnancy is wrong. Today, no bathing suits or swim wear designed to meet the needs of pregnant women. With the creation of swimwear for mothers to be, now women can go to the beach, wearing the latest looks in a bikini and show her belly for summer getaways. First, some pregnant women had people try to enjoy the cold water. In fact, these pregnant women have just read books or processed foods for a family reunion. It is concluded that pregnant women look longingly to swim to the other and have fun in the sun. It is the belief that the pool was bad for the baby and the mother, causing a miscarriage.
I had a pregnant aunt, who dressed in black shorts and socks mounting and white shirts, because there was no bikini is her body. By the way, my aunt as a water nymph, who he likes so much water. In fact, she often tries different water sports like diving, surfing and water skiing every time we go to the beach. Often called a nymph bold fears nothing in the water. But again, softly until she was pregnant with her first child. When she was pregnant and went to the beach, so I wanted to join us. However, the problem had anything to do with her. We all know that most beaches have a rule that requires bathing swim suits for men and pregnant women.
During her second pregnancy she was glad to see that many stores sell more size swimwear. He thought. "Why not use a larger size for me, so I will use" When we went to the beach, wearing, the size swimming again, not really good for your body because it makes him uncomfortable, as if swimming a swimsuit would. Regarding size, the plus size swimwear to be reliable, but in actual use, it is not. Adding size bathing suits are not designed for pregnant women, but women with a size of twelve. Thank God, came, the Brazilian bikinis with their mother swimsuit that is designed exclusively for pregnant women. Now, my aunt, like other pregnant women out there, you can swim comfortably look elegant and sexy.
Maternity clothes inspired bathroom Harmony EQ Swimwear Brazilian bikini. Harmony is the best seller for a swimsuit in one piece. This swimsuit for pregnant women allows women to glide, dive and swim in the water without risk of collapse and has gaps when using it. The colors and style of surfing include Maroon Kona Blue Hibiscus, Daisy Marina Mandarin and floral prints. But for those who want clear and simple, is black as well. One of the best properties of this suit are that it has a line of the front and rear, which helps to support the body and prevent it from collapsing. Another great feature of this study is that it is "fascinating". This means he can lift the curves do not seem to have pets.
Another good source of maternity swimwear is specializes in swimming clothes for pregnant women. This shop has an extensive collection of swimwear, maternity, and requires a swimsuit for mothers to be the goddess of motherhood maternity swimwear by Nicole. The custom of motherhood, said white fabric with touches of blue and green. It has a thin rope wristband can be removed if not required. It has a double line is in the breast area for support and protection. This is a swimsuit that looks like a short dress because the style is for full coverage. Pregnant women can use for swimming and a beach party. It is very elegant and functional at the same time, for pregnant women. Goddess style dress can be washed and ironed without fear of collapse.
The development of swimsuits and bikinis for women with a child's skin is very beneficial not only for pregnant women, but for all sports ** pregnant women. This creation is not just for recreational swimming has been a boon for healthy women during pregnancy. In fact, many doctors and doctors recommend swimming in pregnant women during pregnancy. Swimming pool with exercise and relax the body of pregnant women. Sometimes there are formations that require pregnant women swim suit to enter the water during practice to deliver the baby.
Who says pregnant women can not wear a swimsuit during pregnancy is wrong. Today, no bathing suits or swim wear designed to meet the needs of pregnant women. With the creation of swimwear for mothers to be, now women can go to the beach, wearing the latest looks in a bikini and show her belly for summer getaways. First, some pregnant women had people try to enjoy the cold water. In fact, these pregnant women have just read books or processed foods for a family reunion. It is concluded that pregnant women look longingly to swim to the other and have fun in the sun. It is the belief that the pool was bad for the baby and the mother, causing a miscarriage.
I had a pregnant aunt, who dressed in black shorts and socks mounting and white shirts, because there was no bikini is her body. By the way, my aunt as a water nymph, who he likes so much water. In fact, she often tries different water sports like diving, surfing and water skiing every time we go to the beach. Often called a nymph bold fears nothing in the water. But again, softly until she was pregnant with her first child. When she was pregnant and went to the beach, so I wanted to join us. However, the problem had anything to do with her. We all know that most beaches have a rule that requires bathing swim suits for men and pregnant women.
During her second pregnancy she was glad to see that many stores sell more size swimwear. He thought. "Why not use a larger size for me, so I will use" When we went to the beach, wearing, the size swimming again, not really good for your body because it makes him uncomfortable, as if swimming a swimsuit would. Regarding size, the plus size swimwear to be reliable, but in actual use, it is not. Adding size bathing suits are not designed for pregnant women, but women with a size of twelve. Thank God, came, the Brazilian bikinis with their mother swimsuit that is designed exclusively for pregnant women. Now, my aunt, like other pregnant women out there, you can swim comfortably look elegant and sexy.
Maternity clothes inspired bathroom Harmony EQ Swimwear Brazilian bikini. Harmony is the best seller for a swimsuit in one piece. This swimsuit for pregnant women allows women to glide, dive and swim in the water without risk of collapse and has gaps when using it. The colors and style of surfing include Maroon Kona Blue Hibiscus, Daisy Marina Mandarin and floral prints. But for those who want clear and simple, is black as well. One of the best properties of this suit are that it has a line of the front and rear, which helps to support the body and prevent it from collapsing. Another great feature of this study is that it is "fascinating". This means he can lift the curves do not seem to have pets.
Another good source of maternity swimwear is specializes in swimming clothes for pregnant women. This shop has an extensive collection of swimwear, maternity, and requires a swimsuit for mothers to be the goddess of motherhood maternity swimwear by Nicole. The custom of motherhood, said white fabric with touches of blue and green. It has a thin rope wristband can be removed if not required. It has a double line is in the breast area for support and protection. This is a swimsuit that looks like a short dress because the style is for full coverage. Pregnant women can use for swimming and a beach party. It is very elegant and functional at the same time, for pregnant women. Goddess style dress can be washed and ironed without fear of collapse.
The development of swimsuits and bikinis for women with a child's skin is very beneficial not only for pregnant women, but for all sports ** pregnant women. This creation is not just for recreational swimming has been a boon for healthy women during pregnancy. In fact, many doctors and doctors recommend swimming in pregnant women during pregnancy. Swimming pool with exercise and relax the body of pregnant women. Sometimes there are formations that require pregnant women swim suit to enter the water during practice to deliver the baby.
Leading man Lingerie: Sexy and stylish
When a man wants to buy a gift of lingerie for your partner, can be a daunting and confusing. Where do you start? So many brands and styles available. What are the differences? This brief guide and basic styles and brands of lingerie will help to clarify the basics and gives you a basis for asking the advice of a workshop, store or shop.
There are 6 different categories of lingerie in the market: sporty, natural, elegant occasion, special or sexy bridal lingerie. Of course can these categories overlaps can wedding shops or sexy lingerie be made through a constructor. Underwear sport can be naturally. Natural can be sexy. But understanding these six categories are used to decide which underwear to choose.
Natural rope, generally tend to be functional and less apparent. Simplicity, quality and comfort tend to be the main criteria for their use. Mark of underwear Darjeeling is for women who prefer the natural look.
The purpose of sport is that lingerie lingerie should support but not interfere with the lifestyle of women. It should be obvious in tight fitting clothes and not give up anything in terms of functionality. Prada is known for its sportswear. Sloggi has developed a strong image in this area also.
Elegant lingerie is designed to give women a look of subtle sensuality without being too obviously erotic. There are many types and styles of elegant lingerie cross, with designers. Chantelle lingerie Riviera is an elegant example of underwear
Designer lingerie gives women a feeling of being special. Since few people will ever know, is made by a designer underwear, the woman who spends money on designer lingerie spend much more of himself. The emphasis is on style and comfort or quality. Dolce and Gabbana, Versace and recently popular Agent Provocateur are a few key designers of lingerie.
Sexy Lingerie combines a broad spectrum of styles. There are many types of lingerie can be included here, such as straps or g-strings, teddy, corsets, garters, lower body, underwear, etc. Actually, anyone who can be included in other categories. For example, a chain be fashionable or stylish. A corset can be sexy, provocative or elegant. Each of them can be performed by a designer. But the general aspect of these types of lingerie gives the woman feel sexy. Victoria's Secret has a focus on sexy lingerie. Fredericks is fading competitor. Lola Luna specializes in G-strings or thongs. Lady Marlene focuses on Bustiers. Lise Charmel France combines seduction with fashion.
Bridal lingerie is made for that day for a woman waiting all their lives, their wedding night. Usually a combination of white, cream color, with elegant and sexy. Comfort and durability are not a problem here, but sensuality and style are important. It seems like every lingerie designer markets a range of bridal lingerie.
So what brand you buy your underwear? Above all, it depends on where you live. Lingerie tends to be national or regional level. Although some manufacturers are trying to be global, there is no company dominates the world market:
Chantelle lingerie or one of the biggest brands of French lingerie and exporting to over 50 countries. Passioneta and Darjeeling are trademarks Chantelle. But Chantelle is still very small sales in the U.S..
or La Perla started as a small Italian manufacturer of corsets and is now well known internationally as a manufacturer of underwear
The fantasies or is a designer lingerie in the UK that focuses on lingerie in larger cup sizes. Britain is by far the biggest sales of Fantasia.
or Triumph is a German manufacturer of underwear, such as La Perla debuted as a small local manufacturer of corsets and raised in an international company. Sloggi is a brand owned by Triumph. Victory is only available in North America.
There are 6 different categories of lingerie in the market: sporty, natural, elegant occasion, special or sexy bridal lingerie. Of course can these categories overlaps can wedding shops or sexy lingerie be made through a constructor. Underwear sport can be naturally. Natural can be sexy. But understanding these six categories are used to decide which underwear to choose.
Natural rope, generally tend to be functional and less apparent. Simplicity, quality and comfort tend to be the main criteria for their use. Mark of underwear Darjeeling is for women who prefer the natural look.
Elegant lingerie is designed to give women a look of subtle sensuality without being too obviously erotic. There are many types and styles of elegant lingerie cross, with designers. Chantelle lingerie Riviera is an elegant example of underwear
So what brand you buy your underwear? Above all, it depends on where you live. Lingerie tends to be national or regional level. Although some manufacturers are trying to be global, there is no company dominates the world market:
Chantelle lingerie or one of the biggest brands of French lingerie and exporting to over 50 countries. Passioneta and Darjeeling are trademarks Chantelle. But Chantelle is still very small sales in the U.S..
or La Perla started as a small Italian manufacturer of corsets and is now well known internationally as a manufacturer of underwear
The fantasies or is a designer lingerie in the UK that focuses on lingerie in larger cup sizes. Britain is by far the biggest sales of Fantasia.
or Triumph is a German manufacturer of underwear, such as La Perla debuted as a small local manufacturer of corsets and raised in an international company. Sloggi is a brand owned by Triumph. Victory is only available in North America.
Thursday, February 2, 2012
Questions For Maurice Tomlinson (Gleaner letter) .........
As the furor in a sense continues over former local advocate and lawyer Maurice Tomlinson controversial departure from Jamaica in the form of asylum in Canada and a marriage which he complained that photos were published of his wedding that originally occured way back in August 2011 yet he supplied them to the Star News Canada while the local newspaper simply republished them. Some persons have been vigorously trying to defend his actions obviously missing the point of ethical professionalism needed and missing in this latest open blunder and is reflective of the self serving nature of our or so self appointed representatives when most of the time they speak on our behalf supposedly without any meaningful consultation for a more balanced points of view from the LGBTQIQ2S body politic.
Was this letter even penned by a member of the community really or a homophobe posing as such?
As for his students well they are up in knots along with the administration of the University of Technology, here is the letter from a member of the community, pity their name was not placed. Also what is glaring is that other former activists have left Jamaica without any cloudy and controversial circumstances as the reasons for their departure was clear as crystal to everyone. The letter reads as follows:
IN YOUR editorial on Tuesday, you made mention of the fact that as law students, those who Maurice Tomlinson teach should take into consideration Section 13 (3)(a) of the Charter of Rights in Jamaica's Constitution which speaks about the right to life. As a member of the Lesbian Bisexual Gay and Transgender community, I know all to well the negativity, such as threats and physical attacks, that we as lesbians and gays have to go through at times.
I can also relate to what the students are going through, especially those who have to work while attending school.
I might get a backlash from the community for what I'm about to say, but who gives a damn?
Mr Tomlinson, being a well-known activist, is fully aware of the dangers members of the community face, and as a well-thinking adult, he could have gone about things differently. There's no way his marriage could have remained a secret with him being a well-known activist, and more recently, with him receiving the David Cato award. Mr Tomlinson should have foreseen the current events. It's no business of mine what goes on in Mr Tomlinson's personal life, but he needs to answer a few questions.
1. Why didn't you put a plan in place for your students in the event of incidents like this?
2. Why couldn't you have ended the semester and then take care of your personal life (your wedding)?
3. I'm sure you are capable of using our current technology. Why didn't you plan webinars and make use of various related tools for your students?
It was very rude of Mr Tomlinson to just tell his students to sit in with other lecturer(s).
I'd be very upset too.
Concerned Gay
Also see the post below for more as there have been other members of the community including the intelligentsia who have expressed some outrage at the whole matter and the timing of the wedding article, the timing of the departure of Mr Tomlinson from Jamaica (January 10, 2012) and then the subsequent travel to London to collect the David Kato award and cash grant along with it just looks too suspicious and manipulative of the systems for personal gain. The systems seemed to have been worked especially the lobby for the award in London so enough publicity had to be done via TV appearances and a leaked hint to the wedding in Canada which originally took place in August.
This comment when first made/posted was deleted from a Facebook group where JFLAG operatives converge by one of the administrators who work with the organization I have since gathered. Another dangerous precedence for muzzling and or dictatorship and the prescriptive nature to the rest of the community? yet we ask for tolerance elsewhere.
it stated:
Frankly, from reading this article, I don't get a sense of someone who's been forced to "flee". People who "flee" don't have a return date scheduled. If someone is fleeing for their life because of circumstances beyond control, how exactly did he suddenly regain enough control to be able to"schedule" when his safety concerns had been resolved? What I do get a sense of is someone who's taking advantage of the reputation that Jamaica has gained, and using it to his own ends. That is, how convenient that such "safety concerns" emerge as significant right around the same time when he goes to London to go pick up his award?
http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/jamaican-activist-tomlinson-wins-first-david-kato-award
And who told the newspaper that he was away from work? Let me guess....
Suffice it to say, this story reeks of unprofessional and unethical behaviour on Maurice's part. It may well be that faculty members in Jamaica can and do mistreat students however they want - cancel classes, don't show up, don't give the students their grades, etc. - with no repercussions. But to use homophobia as the excuse for not showing up, ad to have the administration in knots over how to deal with this crisis, when I'm sure they sense that things are not as they appear - that is beyond selfish and self-involved.
I am totally sick and tired of lgbt Jamaican individuals manipulating the already hostile situation at home by making themselves into scapegoats and victims, just so they can appropriate resources and attention for themselves. I was wondering where the leaked story of the wedding was going, and I can already see.
In my opinion, there needs to be a total news lockout against Maurice Tomlinson unless what he's talking about or doing DIRECTLY involves broader community, and there's sufficient corroboration of his accounts. He is being very manipulative in his conduct, and is harming the movement in many ways. Others have pulled similar stunts in the past, but Maurice is taking the situation to a whole other level. And he's counting on the silence and gullibility of lgbt Jamaicans as well as the fears of straight people to help him accomplish whatever he's set his mind to, and which won't benefit anyone but himself. Enough already."
Was this letter even penned by a member of the community really or a homophobe posing as such?
As for his students well they are up in knots along with the administration of the University of Technology, here is the letter from a member of the community, pity their name was not placed. Also what is glaring is that other former activists have left Jamaica without any cloudy and controversial circumstances as the reasons for their departure was clear as crystal to everyone. The letter reads as follows:
Questions For Maurice Tomlinson
THE EDITOR, Sir:IN YOUR editorial on Tuesday, you made mention of the fact that as law students, those who Maurice Tomlinson teach should take into consideration Section 13 (3)(a) of the Charter of Rights in Jamaica's Constitution which speaks about the right to life. As a member of the Lesbian Bisexual Gay and Transgender community, I know all to well the negativity, such as threats and physical attacks, that we as lesbians and gays have to go through at times.
I can also relate to what the students are going through, especially those who have to work while attending school.
I might get a backlash from the community for what I'm about to say, but who gives a damn?
Mr Tomlinson, being a well-known activist, is fully aware of the dangers members of the community face, and as a well-thinking adult, he could have gone about things differently. There's no way his marriage could have remained a secret with him being a well-known activist, and more recently, with him receiving the David Cato award. Mr Tomlinson should have foreseen the current events. It's no business of mine what goes on in Mr Tomlinson's personal life, but he needs to answer a few questions.
1. Why didn't you put a plan in place for your students in the event of incidents like this?
2. Why couldn't you have ended the semester and then take care of your personal life (your wedding)?
3. I'm sure you are capable of using our current technology. Why didn't you plan webinars and make use of various related tools for your students?
It was very rude of Mr Tomlinson to just tell his students to sit in with other lecturer(s).
I'd be very upset too.
Concerned Gay
ENDS
Also see the post below for more as there have been other members of the community including the intelligentsia who have expressed some outrage at the whole matter and the timing of the wedding article, the timing of the departure of Mr Tomlinson from Jamaica (January 10, 2012) and then the subsequent travel to London to collect the David Kato award and cash grant along with it just looks too suspicious and manipulative of the systems for personal gain. The systems seemed to have been worked especially the lobby for the award in London so enough publicity had to be done via TV appearances and a leaked hint to the wedding in Canada which originally took place in August.
This comment when first made/posted was deleted from a Facebook group where JFLAG operatives converge by one of the administrators who work with the organization I have since gathered. Another dangerous precedence for muzzling and or dictatorship and the prescriptive nature to the rest of the community? yet we ask for tolerance elsewhere.
it stated:
Frankly, from reading this article, I don't get a sense of someone who's been forced to "flee". People who "flee" don't have a return date scheduled. If someone is fleeing for their life because of circumstances beyond control, how exactly did he suddenly regain enough control to be able to"schedule" when his safety concerns had been resolved? What I do get a sense of is someone who's taking advantage of the reputation that Jamaica has gained, and using it to his own ends. That is, how convenient that such "safety concerns" emerge as significant right around the same time when he goes to London to go pick up his award?
http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/jamaican-activist-tomlinson-wins-first-david-kato-award
And who told the newspaper that he was away from work? Let me guess....
Suffice it to say, this story reeks of unprofessional and unethical behaviour on Maurice's part. It may well be that faculty members in Jamaica can and do mistreat students however they want - cancel classes, don't show up, don't give the students their grades, etc. - with no repercussions. But to use homophobia as the excuse for not showing up, ad to have the administration in knots over how to deal with this crisis, when I'm sure they sense that things are not as they appear - that is beyond selfish and self-involved.
I am totally sick and tired of lgbt Jamaican individuals manipulating the already hostile situation at home by making themselves into scapegoats and victims, just so they can appropriate resources and attention for themselves. I was wondering where the leaked story of the wedding was going, and I can already see.
In my opinion, there needs to be a total news lockout against Maurice Tomlinson unless what he's talking about or doing DIRECTLY involves broader community, and there's sufficient corroboration of his accounts. He is being very manipulative in his conduct, and is harming the movement in many ways. Others have pulled similar stunts in the past, but Maurice is taking the situation to a whole other level. And he's counting on the silence and gullibility of lgbt Jamaicans as well as the fears of straight people to help him accomplish whatever he's set his mind to, and which won't benefit anyone but himself. Enough already."
Obviously this one is being kept alive as the letter above is published by the Gleaner. While some days ago Mr Tomlinson gave a statement via AIDSFREEWORLD
Remarks by Maurice Tomlinson, AIDS-Free World’s Legal Advisor on Marginalized Groups, upon receiving the inaugural ‘David Kato Vision and Voice Award’ London, UK, January 29, 2012, 6:00 PM
more on audio
Peace and tolerance
H
Remarks by Maurice Tomlinson, AIDS-Free World’s Legal Advisor on Marginalized Groups, upon receiving the inaugural ‘David Kato Vision and Voice Award’ London, UK, January 29, 2012, 6:00 PM
more on audio
Peace and tolerance
H
Tuesday, January 31, 2012
PM Should Decry Homophobic Bigotry says Gleaner but some questions & issues present themselves
The story of Maurice Tomlinson, a lecturer at the University of Technology (UTech), reported by this newspaper yesterday, reverberates with the insensitivity of supposed students of the law and at the same time highlights the mediaeval attitude that still largely prevails in Jamaica towards gays.
And having declared her principled position on the rights of gays, Prime Minister Portia Simpson Miller should add her voice to the protection of Mr Tomlinson's rights under the Constitution of Jamaica.
Maurice Tomlinson is an attorney. He also teaches law at UTech. He came into public notice more recently when it was reported in Canada that he had married his male partner.
In homophobic Jamaica, where a former prime minister declared that he would have no gays in his Cabinet and his successor waffled, equivocated on and parsed his response to the subject, Mr Tomlinson's action is a potential death sentence.
Myopic law students
Indeed, he has gone into hiding and has told this newspaper that he was advised by the police that it would be unsafe to appear on the UTech campus "because my security has been compromised". Put bluntly, Mr Tomlinson has received death threats.
The university law faculty has been unable, as yet, to find a substitute lecturer for Mr Tomlinson's course, and students were advised - apparently by Mr Tomlinson - to sit in with other lecturers.
What has surprised this newspaper is the response of some part-time students affected by the disruption - an apparent absence of sympathy or concern for a man whose life is reportedly in danger.
They are angry over personal scheduling difficulties caused by Mr Tomlinson's absence, complaining that even with the arrangement he attempted to put in place, "we will still be at a disadvantage".
We would be forgiven if we concluded that this lack of empathy and compassion by the affected law students betrays both deep moral failings and weak appreciation for the course of study on which they have embarked. Put another way, it would seem that the concentration of these UTech students is on certification. The substance of the law is secondary.
Breach to one, breach to all
What even early students of the law, like those taught by Mr Tomlinson, should have already learnt is that their rights as individuals cannot be secure if his can be trampled on with impunity. The ultimate protection of one's rights is a democratic society's adherence to the rule of law. There is no more fundamental right than the right to one's life, which, incidentally, is among the first named rights and freedoms protected in Section 13 (3)(a) of the Charter of Rights in Jamaica's Constitution.
Perhaps, in time, the peeved UTech students will appreciate that the application of the law has to be universal, and universally fair, for it to be worthy. Prime Minister Simpson Miller can help in promoting this understanding.
The prime minister displayed courage in defending people's right to lifestyles of their choice when she declared that sexual orientation would not be a criterion for membership in her Cabinet. She must repeat often that there is no right to impunity against people whose lifestyles the majority does not like. For a real test of a democracy is how it protects the rights of minorities.
The PM should also champion the cause for the repeal of the buggery law.
The opinions on this page, except for the above, do not necessarily reflect the views of The Gleaner. To respond to a Gleaner editorial, email us: editor@gleanerjm.com or fax: 922-6223. Responses should be no longer than 400 words. Not all responses will be published.
And having declared her principled position on the rights of gays, Prime Minister Portia Simpson Miller should add her voice to the protection of Mr Tomlinson's rights under the Constitution of Jamaica.
Maurice Tomlinson is an attorney. He also teaches law at UTech. He came into public notice more recently when it was reported in Canada that he had married his male partner.
In homophobic Jamaica, where a former prime minister declared that he would have no gays in his Cabinet and his successor waffled, equivocated on and parsed his response to the subject, Mr Tomlinson's action is a potential death sentence.
Myopic law students
Indeed, he has gone into hiding and has told this newspaper that he was advised by the police that it would be unsafe to appear on the UTech campus "because my security has been compromised". Put bluntly, Mr Tomlinson has received death threats.
The university law faculty has been unable, as yet, to find a substitute lecturer for Mr Tomlinson's course, and students were advised - apparently by Mr Tomlinson - to sit in with other lecturers.
What has surprised this newspaper is the response of some part-time students affected by the disruption - an apparent absence of sympathy or concern for a man whose life is reportedly in danger.
They are angry over personal scheduling difficulties caused by Mr Tomlinson's absence, complaining that even with the arrangement he attempted to put in place, "we will still be at a disadvantage".
We would be forgiven if we concluded that this lack of empathy and compassion by the affected law students betrays both deep moral failings and weak appreciation for the course of study on which they have embarked. Put another way, it would seem that the concentration of these UTech students is on certification. The substance of the law is secondary.
Breach to one, breach to all
What even early students of the law, like those taught by Mr Tomlinson, should have already learnt is that their rights as individuals cannot be secure if his can be trampled on with impunity. The ultimate protection of one's rights is a democratic society's adherence to the rule of law. There is no more fundamental right than the right to one's life, which, incidentally, is among the first named rights and freedoms protected in Section 13 (3)(a) of the Charter of Rights in Jamaica's Constitution.
Perhaps, in time, the peeved UTech students will appreciate that the application of the law has to be universal, and universally fair, for it to be worthy. Prime Minister Simpson Miller can help in promoting this understanding.
The prime minister displayed courage in defending people's right to lifestyles of their choice when she declared that sexual orientation would not be a criterion for membership in her Cabinet. She must repeat often that there is no right to impunity against people whose lifestyles the majority does not like. For a real test of a democracy is how it protects the rights of minorities.
The PM should also champion the cause for the repeal of the buggery law.
The opinions on this page, except for the above, do not necessarily reflect the views of The Gleaner. To respond to a Gleaner editorial, email us: editor@gleanerjm.com or fax: 922-6223. Responses should be no longer than 400 words. Not all responses will be published.
ENDS
How much do we want from the Prime Minister in such a short space of time?, this is almost as dumb as the JFLAG error in stating a timeline within 100 days when the issue MUST be discussed then having to turn around and do damage control so as not to make it look like an ultimatum after the fire-storm from both inside the LGBT community and outside especially with that persistent thinking that the ruling party was funded by gay interests outside so as to push the battyman issue.
Why should the PM only deal with this because it's Maurice Tomlinson, is he so special over all the others before and with him especially those persons who do their respective work quietly in the community without a song and dance? After all he chose to put himself out there so it comes with the repercussions.
The glaring contempt towards persons who work quietly in the local community is showing its head again as JFLAG operatives themselves have brought to bear when some rude criticisms have been brought to the fore regarding the recent departure of Mr. Tomlinson under questionable circumstances. He complained that the Observer for example published an unauthorised photo of him hence putting his life in danger yet he forgot to mention his very public television appearances long before the shots were seen in print and why did he send the shot of his signing the licence in Canada to a Catherine Porter of the Gay Star News? and the subsequent timing of this to coincide with the David Kato award collection in London with the large purse attached has left some doubt in the minds of many as professional dishonesty is reeking from all these circumstances. All the Observer had to do was republish the story under the creative commons license protection originally carried by Star News Canada written by the aforementioned author in a piece entitled: "Jamaican gay activist, Maurice Tomlinson, married a Torontonian" whils stating the source. The photo clearly showed it was courtesy of Tomlinson, if he did not want this issue out there why allow the overseas article to be put out in the first place?
All these set of circumstances so close to each other and so well timed does not look good.
Criticisms have been rising about these and other issues and reputations are being re-examined to find out why is it some persons seem to easily benefit from activities in the name of defending the community? I have been on record to say it is all about superstardom and not about looking at the community as a whole, this first pass the post drama to see who will get the recognition is just too glaring these days while the least amongst us continue to struggle. The Gleaner also carried this piece: Threats force gay lecturer to flee which has had some reaction from influentials. This is how strong a comment that came from such a person:
"Frankly, from reading this article, I don't get a sense of someone who's been forced to "flee". People who "flee" don't have a return date scheduled. If someone is fleeing for their life because of circumstances beyond control, how exactly did he suddenly regain enough control to be able to"schedule" when his safety concerns had been resolved? What I do get a sense of is someone who's taking advantage of the reputation that Jamaica has gained, and using it to his own ends. That is, how convenient that such "safety concerns" emerge as significant right around the same time when he goes to London to go pick up his award?
http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/jamaican-activist-tomlinson-wins-first-david-kato-award
And who told the newspaper that he was away from work? Let me guess....
Suffice it to say, this story reeks of unprofessional and unethical behaviour on Maurice's part. It may well be that faculty members in Jamaica can and do mistreat students however they want - cancel classes, don't show up, don't give the students their grades, etc. - with no repercussions. But to use homophobia as the excuse for not showing up, ad to have the administration in knots over how to deal with this crisis, when I'm sure they sense that things are not as they appear - that is beyond selfish and self-involved.
I am totally sick and tired of lgbt Jamaican individuals manipulating the already hostile situation at home by making themselves into scapegoats and victims, just so they can appropriate resources and attention for themselves. I was wondering where the leaked story of the wedding was going, and I can already see.
In my opinion, there needs to be a total news lockout against Maurice Tomlinson unless what he's talking about or doing DIRECTLY involves broader community, and there's sufficient corroboration of his accounts. He is being very manipulative in his conduct, and is harming the movement in many ways. Others have pulled similar stunts in the past, but Maurice is taking the situation to a whole other level. And he's counting on the silence and gullibility of lgbt Jamaicans as well as the fears of straight people to help him accomplish whatever he's set his mind to, and which won't benefit anyone but himself. Enough already."
http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/jamaican-activist-tomlinson-wins-first-david-kato-award
And who told the newspaper that he was away from work? Let me guess....
Suffice it to say, this story reeks of unprofessional and unethical behaviour on Maurice's part. It may well be that faculty members in Jamaica can and do mistreat students however they want - cancel classes, don't show up, don't give the students their grades, etc. - with no repercussions. But to use homophobia as the excuse for not showing up, ad to have the administration in knots over how to deal with this crisis, when I'm sure they sense that things are not as they appear - that is beyond selfish and self-involved.
I am totally sick and tired of lgbt Jamaican individuals manipulating the already hostile situation at home by making themselves into scapegoats and victims, just so they can appropriate resources and attention for themselves. I was wondering where the leaked story of the wedding was going, and I can already see.
In my opinion, there needs to be a total news lockout against Maurice Tomlinson unless what he's talking about or doing DIRECTLY involves broader community, and there's sufficient corroboration of his accounts. He is being very manipulative in his conduct, and is harming the movement in many ways. Others have pulled similar stunts in the past, but Maurice is taking the situation to a whole other level. And he's counting on the silence and gullibility of lgbt Jamaicans as well as the fears of straight people to help him accomplish whatever he's set his mind to, and which won't benefit anyone but himself. Enough already."
The comment when first made/posted was deleted from a Facebook group where JFLAG operatives converge by one of the administrators who work with the organization I have since gathered. Another dangerous precedence for muzzling and or dictatorship to the rest of the community? yet we ask for tolerance elsewhere.
ALSO AUDIO:
Frankly this whole episode has stirred up a hornet's nest and the bigger issue of ethical professionalism is back at the forefront but for how long will it remain as usually when it does make centerstage some other items are quickly found to create a diversion.
Peace and tolerance
H
Monday, January 30, 2012
It's bigotry if church discriminates against homosexuals (Observer Letter) .....
Dear Editor,
As a devout churchman I fail to appreciate the concern that many of my church folk have about the buggery law. The practice of faith, the last time I checked in my church, was based on the teachings of the Bible, not on the legislature. The church does not need the support of the state in order to practise its beliefs. If it does, then we must worry. But what would be the legal implications if the buggery laws were repealed in Jamaica?
It seems to me that it would come down to a question of whether the right to choose one's sexual expression isn't one that can be surrendered to the dictates of a religious body to which one belongs - meaning that one's belief and practice of one's sexual expressions are subjected to the authority of the church. If choosing one's sexuality is an inalienable right, then the church would be practising its belief in violation of the law. But if it is not an inalienable right, then legally the church is within its right to maintain its position that homosexuality is wrong.
I agree with those who are convinced that the issue is not about homosexuality as it is about rights, which is a discussion that must take place well beyond the parameters of one's sexual orientation. God made man with the power of choice, and unless in the exercise - in particular instances - infringes on another's right, then those choices should be between God and the individuals.
Granted, as God's servants whose understanding would place the burden on us to appeal to those who are leading an objectionable lifestyle, we are obliged to publish our beliefs - not in a manner as to condemn, but to persuade those we are concerned about that it would be in their best interest to follow God's recommended way to live. And we do this with the full knowledge that there is an extensive list of unholy practices that would separate us from God. We therefore do not discriminate against homosexuals. That would be bigotry.
I would take exception to any individual or group who would, without the support of scripture, want to redefine the belief system of my church. With the many religious options there are in the world today, among which are sympathisers to the homosexual way of life, coupled with the fact that church membership is not an inalienable right, why would an individual or a group want to take a church to court? If it were me, I would find one where I am accepted, or create my own. You need your space to live as you believe, please allow me mine. But if you won't, the Bible rules.
Charles Evans
charock01@yahoo.com
As a devout churchman I fail to appreciate the concern that many of my church folk have about the buggery law. The practice of faith, the last time I checked in my church, was based on the teachings of the Bible, not on the legislature. The church does not need the support of the state in order to practise its beliefs. If it does, then we must worry. But what would be the legal implications if the buggery laws were repealed in Jamaica?
It seems to me that it would come down to a question of whether the right to choose one's sexual expression isn't one that can be surrendered to the dictates of a religious body to which one belongs - meaning that one's belief and practice of one's sexual expressions are subjected to the authority of the church. If choosing one's sexuality is an inalienable right, then the church would be practising its belief in violation of the law. But if it is not an inalienable right, then legally the church is within its right to maintain its position that homosexuality is wrong.
I agree with those who are convinced that the issue is not about homosexuality as it is about rights, which is a discussion that must take place well beyond the parameters of one's sexual orientation. God made man with the power of choice, and unless in the exercise - in particular instances - infringes on another's right, then those choices should be between God and the individuals.
Granted, as God's servants whose understanding would place the burden on us to appeal to those who are leading an objectionable lifestyle, we are obliged to publish our beliefs - not in a manner as to condemn, but to persuade those we are concerned about that it would be in their best interest to follow God's recommended way to live. And we do this with the full knowledge that there is an extensive list of unholy practices that would separate us from God. We therefore do not discriminate against homosexuals. That would be bigotry.
I would take exception to any individual or group who would, without the support of scripture, want to redefine the belief system of my church. With the many religious options there are in the world today, among which are sympathisers to the homosexual way of life, coupled with the fact that church membership is not an inalienable right, why would an individual or a group want to take a church to court? If it were me, I would find one where I am accepted, or create my own. You need your space to live as you believe, please allow me mine. But if you won't, the Bible rules.
Charles Evans
charock01@yahoo.com
ENDS
Pity the church was not named which makes the authenticity of the letter questionable but if it is so according to the writer the separation of church and state seems unclear to the writer when in the end the subtle suggestion of the Bible being the end all for LGBT people to follow.
But locally the moral authority and their motives of the religious community comes into serious question when the groups and the Council of Churches find time to aggressively and publicly block the newly instituted Sunday racing yesterday crying fowl and the gambling issue distorting the moral fibre of society,
also see the Gleaner's: Church Livid
yet hypocritically Saturday racing has had no major opposition all these many years not even from the powerful Seventh Day Adventists who worship on a Saturday or Friday racing where the Sabbath starts for some on that evening. Some critics go as far to say that the complaints from the church are due to the possibly loss of income in tithes and offerings with the prosperity gospel line some denominations take. The head of the Council of Churches Reverend Harriot in a radio interview said the church has always been opposed to gambling as it is poor people's money who are used to enrich rich, when questioned about the right of persons to choose he said that while they are not forced they are subtly made to gamble. He continued that families get destroyed etc but doesn't stigmatising lgbt people and bashing them also damage families when we see displacement, estranged loved ones and churches who openly read out perceived LGBT people? Other leaders in the grouping have said that racing can take place without the gambling component present and the opening of the betting shops.
Why does the church feel it must impose its will over freedom of choice of the sinner? this seems like a kind of absolute monarchy wanting to rule every aspect of life.
The thousands of missing children as I have referred to in previous posts and the daily Ananda alerts in the newspapers also does not get the attention and coordinated aggressive responses from the church as homosexuality does and this perception that the gay lobby is trying to impose same on the society when all that is asked for is the right for consenting adults to practice a form of sex associated with male homosexuality, not all same gender loving men or men who dabble in anal or male to male play are homosexual either, a fact that has been left out of the discourse from most sides.
Time and money are found for those with information coming to the fore for recent anti gay public education campaigns with multi million dollar full paged print ads but not for rehabilitation of things and societal ills right before our eyes, we have a long way to go it seems. What about the homeless or destitute and aren't there churches and related folks wealthy too?
Do you agree with the letter writer ??
Peace and tolerance
H
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)